|
Fact: |
“There is no
credible evidence of money laundering
associated with online gambling. Land-based
gambling in venues such as casinos and race
tracks is more susceptible to money
laundering than online gambling. United
States government studies have concluded
that it is unlikely that online gambling can
be used for money laundering because there
are no anonymous cash transactions in an
online gambling transaction, unlike in
land-based casinos where money laundering
has been, continues to be, a concern. |
|
Details: |
While United
States officials frequently contend that
online casinos and sportsbooks are
susceptible to money laundering, they have
never cited an actual example of such
activity. If money laundering in online
gambling was as apparent as these officials
claim, then, by their logic, any foreign
business could be shut down for money
laundering on mere allegations of such
activity. There is no money laundering in
the online gambling industry. The United
States has issued official government
studies concluding that online gambling is
not a likely or accessible avenue for money
laundering because the identities of the
gamblers are known, the financial
transactions between the bettors and
operators are all in an electronic format,
and all of the wagering is recorded. By
contrast, land-based casinos in the United
States have had documented incidents of
actual money laundering due to the large
volume of anonymous cash transactions taking
place at casinos. Within the last two
years, money laundering scandals have
erupted in the United States land-based
casino industry, such as the case of large
casinos failing to complete anti-money
laundering forms for winning customers and a
criminal syndicate from Japan laundering
money through Nevada casinos. The United
States government alleged that a group of
alleged Muslim terrorists in Buffalo, New
York were laundering money through a local
casino.
To the extent
there is a legitimate concern about money
laundering in the gambling industry, the
concern could be resolved by encouraging the
use of credit cards and other secure forms
of electronic payments for online gambling
and regulation of the online gambling
industry. That way, there would be a
regulated system that ensured an “electronic
footprint” in all gambling transactions.
This would eliminate any remote risk of
money laundering in the online gambling
industry. |
|
References: |
United States
General Accounting Office, Money Laundering:
Rapid Growth of Casinos Makes Them
Vulnerable,
GAO/GGD-96-28 (4 January 1996)

United States
General Accounting Office, Money Laundering:
Extent of Money Laundering through Credit
Cards is Unknown;
GAO-02-670 (22 July
2002). This report states: “The extent
to which money laundering through credit
cards may be occurring is unknown. Bank
regulators, credit card industry
representatives, and law enforcement
officials we interviewed generally agreed
that credit card accounts were not likely to
be used in the initial stage of money
laundering when illicit cash is first placed
into the financial system, because the
industry generally restricts cash payments.
Bank regulators and credit card industry
representatives we interviewed acknowledged
that credit card accounts might be used in
the layering or integration stages of money
laundering. For example, by using illicit
funds already placed in a bank account to
pay a credit card bill for goods purchased,
a money launderer has integrated his illicit
funds into the financial system. Most law
enforcement officials we met with were
unable to cite any specific cases of credit
card–facilitated money laundering in
U.S.–based financial institutions. Further,
a FinCEN analysis of its database of SARs
filed by U.S.-based financial institutions
revealed very little evidence of potential
money laundering through credit cards.”

United States
General Accounting Office, Internet
Gambling: An Overview of the Issues,
GAO-03-89 (2 December 2002). With respect to
money laundering, this report states:
“Representatives of law enforcement
agencies, regulatory bodies, and the credit
card and gaming industries expressed mixed
views regarding the vulnerability of
Internet gambling to money laundering. Law
enforcement officials said they believed
that Internet gambling could potentially be
a powerful vehicle for laundering criminal
proceeds at the relatively obscure layering
stage of money laundering . . . Law
enforcement officials acknowledged the lack
of adjudicated cases involving money
laundering through Internet gambling sites
but cited what they believed to be
contributing factors, including the lack of
any industry regulations or oversight.
Banking and gaming regulatory officials did
not view Internet gambling as being
particularly susceptible to money
laundering, especially when credit cards,
which create a transaction record and are
subject to relatively low transaction
limits, are used for payment. Likewise,
credit card and gaming industry officials
did not believe Internet gambling posed any
particular risks in terms of money
laundering. Gaming industry officials did
not believe that Internet gambling was any
more or less susceptible to money laundering
than other types of electronic commerce and
pointed out that, in their view, the
financial industry, which is responsible for
the payments system, is better suited to
monitoring for suspicious activity in the
area than the gaming industry itself.”
(emphasis supplied)

American
Gaming Association, Fact Sheet: Money
Laundering [http://www.americangaming.org/Industry/factsheets/issues_detail.cfv?id=3].
CasinoWatch.Org [Anti-Gambling Advocacy
Group], “Money Laundering in Casinos.” This
site documents a number of money laundering
incidents in United States land-based
casinos. [http://www.casinowatch.org/crime/money_laundering.html]. |